NEWS RELEASE
PUBLIC INFORMATION DEPARTMENT
PO Box 567, Buies Creek, NC 27506
Tel: (910) 893-1224 w Fax: (910) 893-1922
Edwin G. Wilson
Commencement Address
Campbell University
May 10, 2004
I would like to
say how happy -- and how honored -- I am to have been invited to
speak at Campbell University’s Commencement exercises and to have
become a Campbell alumnus. Ever since I was a student at the old
Wake Forest campus just sixteen or so miles north of Raleigh, I have
known and appreciated Campbell, and over recent decades I have
admired the extraordinary achievements of Norman “Ed” Wiggins as day
after day, month after month, year after year, he has brought new
strength, new programs, new schools to this good place. He and I,
once upon a time, were Wake Forest faculty members together, and I
salute him today with friendship and affection. I also salute Jerry
Wallace, whom I congratulate on his important new responsibilities,
coming to him after years of distinguished service, and who is
already destined for presidential leadership of a rare quality. He
also is a long-time friend. And I cannot fail to say while I am
here that both President Wiggins’ wife Millie and President
Wallace’s daughter-in-law Marybeth were coworkers of mine at Wake
Forest. They are both splendid women and dear friends.
* * * * *
A few
weeks ago I rented a DVD of the movie adventure epic
Lawrence of Arabia,
a favorite of mine ever since I first saw it in New York City more than
forty years ago. At the time, I was thinking about this Commencement
address that I had been asked to give, and I was fumbling around, so far
unsuccessfully, for an appropriate topic: one, I hoped, that would be
appropriate for this Campbell University occasion.
The movie
started, and soon I was lost in the breathtakingly beautiful -- and
terrifying -- Arabian desert(unfortunately more familiar to us now than it was when the movie first
appeared). Then, suddenly, a bit of dialogue occurred which, strange as
it may seem to you, brought me back to my Commencement speech. Lawrence
has just encountered an Arab warrior named Ali Ibn El Kharish, and he
immediately has good reason to fear and distrust him. Therefore, when
Ali asks Lawrence, “What is your name?” Lawrence replies, “My name is
for my friends.” And Lawrence will not give away his name.
Why was
it, I asked myself, that Lawrence thought his name was so valuable?
Lawrence might well have offered Ali a drink from his canteen, some
dates to eat, a cape to wear, but his name he would not give
away. His name, I saw, was that possession of his which most thoroughly
represented himself; it was, if you like, the essence of himself. And,
as I realized the implications of what Lawrence was saying, there
flashed into my mind -- perhaps illogically, you will say -- that
incomparable opening sentence from John’s Gospel: “In the beginning was
the Word.”
Several
days after my movie experience, I read a story about the Holocaust.
Elie Wiesel, the Nobel Laureate, himself a survivor of Auschwitz,
and a man who in his writings and in his life has borne witness to the
horrors of the Nazis’ concentration camps and gas chambers, had been
interviewed for the story. And Wiesel recalled that, when he was at
Auschwitz, he had, in his words, “no name, no hope, no future.” He was
known “only by his number.” He had had “no name” to give, and
therefore he was reduced to the nothingness of a number -- even though
he walked and talked like other men outside the camp.
Obviously, I saw a link between the “name” of Lawrence that he would not
give away and the “name” that Elie Wiesel, during a bitter time, did not
even have. And then -- for the mind moves mysteriously in its efforts
toward coherence -- I remembered what was perhaps my favorite fairy tale
from the Brothers Grimm: the story of Rumpelstiltskin, that little man
who spun gold out of straw for the miller’s daughter in return for her
promise that, unless she could discover his name within three days, she
would have to give him her first child. The miller’s daughter tried for
two days to guess his name: Caspar? Melchior? Cowribs? Spiderlegs?
Finally, on the third day, because a friendly messenger had overheard
the little man declaring aloud his name, she knew what to ask: Tom?
Dick? Rumpelstiltskin? And the little man, now without power, and
shrieking and angry, tore himself into pieces. He no longer wanted to
live: his name had been captured, and he had been revealed for what he
was.
You will
forgive me, I hope, for moving now through what may appear to be an
unseemly transition from the ridiculous to the sublime. For I have one
more illustration to offer, and it also arises from a memory of
childhood. When I was a boy of, I suppose, ten or twelve, I had as a
Sunday school teacher a deeply religious and perceptive man who, week
after week, told us stories from the Bible. One Sunday he told us about
Moses and the burning bush, and he dwelt with emphasis on those verses
in which Moses says unto God, “. . . when I come unto the children of
Israel . . . and they shall say to me, What is his name? what
shall I say unto them? And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM . . .
say unto the children I AM hath sent me unto you.”
That
story had a profound impact on my boyish conscience. I didn’t really
understand it. (Does anyone really understand it?) But what I heard in
the story was a man asking God Himself what His name was and God
replying in richly ambiguous and poetic words -- words which I found
strangely unsettling. I was so affected, I will tell you in all
honesty, that ever since I have not liked to speak the name of
God in public.
But to
return to my Commencement theme, which, you now see clearly, has to do
with the significance, the centrality, even the sacredness of names.
Especially on a day like this one, we are newly conscious of names from
our past: of James Archibald Campbell and Leslie Campbell, those
pioneers whose family name is before your eyes and on your lips almost
every day of your college lives; of Norman Wiggins and Jerry Wallace and A.R. Burkot, whom I read about a few days
ago in The Campbell Prospect. Names are all around us, and they
speak at once of the rich heritage that is ours.
But it is not Lawrence of Arabia or Elie Wiesel or
Rumpelstilskin or even the Campbells who are the destination of my remarks this morning. I would
speak rather of the names of you students -- the name by which each of
you is called -- the name which, like a Word, has been yours from the
beginning. Unlike Elie Wiesel you have a name; at Campbell, you are not
merely a number. Unlike Lawrence of Arabia, you have nothing to fear;
unlike Rumpelstilskin, you have nothing to hide; unlike James A. and
Leslie Campbell, your name has not passed into history. You are young
and vibrant and alive to the future. And yet your name already speaks
of who you are.
Have you ever
thought, about a person you have known a long time, that no name other
than the one she has would do for that person? When I think about my
two daughters, I see them only as Sally and Julie. I can’t imagine them
as Rebecca and Patricia. Rebecca and Patricia wouldn’t fit. Can those
of you who know Little Women imagine Jo being called Meg or Beth
answering to the name of Amy?
No, your
name is already peculiarly your own, and irrevocably your own. And
around your name has already formed a cluster of associations to which
your parents, your brothers and sisters, your friends have contributed
impressions and opinions. Since you came to Campbell your name has
become surrounded on this campus with comments and evaluations and
attitudes friendly or neutral or even, now and then, hostile. Your name
is the sum of who you are or, at least, whom you seem to be.
And that
is why it is the peculiar task of your life -- as you move ahead from
college into the world -- to attend to your name, to strengthen it, to
respect it -- in short, to honor it as the most conspicuous outward
symbol of your very self.
The poet
William Butler Yeats said, very near the end of his life, that if he had
to summarize in one sentence what he had learned in the more than seven
decades of a career filled with insights and honors, he would say, “Man
can embody truth but he cannot know it.”
You and I search --
in our classrooms, in our laboratories, in our late-night conversations,
in our readings, in our churches -- for what we optimistically call the
truth, and we gradually construct our own understanding of truth,
centered as often as not around our definition of Him who said I AM THAT
I AM. But we know that, to our human eyes, the truth is not always
obvious.As Charles Seeger said, “The truth is a rabbit in a bramble
patch. All you can do is circle around and say it’s somewhere in
there.”
But, even
though we cannot always know the truth, can we, in Yeats’s word,
“embody” it?
Do you
know the old-fashioned Christian catechism which begins, before anything
else is asked, with the question “What is your Name?” May I use the
language of poetry and faith to suggest that, just as once upon a time
the Word became flesh, so in your time the Name which is yours became
the living person that you are? And that your mission in life is so to
“embody” that name that, when it is spoken or read, it means truth: a
truth that is faithful to where you came from; a truth that presents
itself in the same way to the most prestigious person you know and
to the humblest person you know; a truth that so uniformly manifests
itself in public and in private that the person your friends know is the
same person you truly are and that you know yourself to be.
“A good
name,” the Book of Proverbs said, “is rather to be chosen than great
riches.” And in Ecclesiastes we read, “A good name is better than
precious ointment.” The purpose of true education, especially at a
place like Campbell University, is, I believe, to be able to live your
life after college in such a way as to show that you really believe what
those proverbs say. Your name will not need “riches” to ornament it,
nor will it require “precious ointment” to make it sweeter. It will
stand, simply, for what it is: the pure and innermost expression of who
you really are. Through honor, through integrity, you can -- in your
own inimitable way -- “embody” the truth.
Bulletin 0141 |