Chapter 8: Organizing for the Activity-Based Program
Organization
Planning is a continuous process
Organization begins when action occurs
The planned and intentional structure of roles or
positions in an identified unit that seeks to achieve established purposes and
objectives
Term may refer to an institution or enterprise
Purpose of organizing is to make human effort
productive and effective
Organizational Roles
Identify verifiable objectives which are a major part
of planning
Include a clear idea of the major duties or activities
involved
Incorporate an understood area of discretion or
authority, so that the people filling the roles know what they can do to
accomplish results
These roles must be intentionally planned and designed
Formal Organization
A planned structure that is identified and made known
to all who relate to the productive unit
Enables the individual to understand the roles of
group members as they strive for common objectives
Cooperation and unity are keys to fulfilling purpose
Informal Organization
Is any group that contributes to joint outcomes
without a conscious joint goal
Social groupings
Church groupings
Departmentalization
Establishing organizational divisions
The department is a distinct area or division of an
enterprise with a director who has authority and responsibility for the
performance of specified activities
Departmentalization by Numbers
Based on a certain number of people
Manager is appointed to the group to direct activities
Israelites
Military
This method is not often used due to:
Technology has fostered many specialized skills
Grouping by special interest is more efficient
Only Useful at lower organizational levels
Departmentalization by Function
Follows the principle of task specialization
Figures 8.1, 8.2, and 8.3 show task specialization
Figure
8.3
Span of Control and Organizational Levels
How to make the control function most efficient
Span of control refers to the number of subordinates
that a manager supervises
Limit is from 4 to 15 (upper level to lower level)
Complexity of tasks
Maturity and experience of personnel
If the span is narrow there are more levels to the
organization
Narrow Span of Control
Advantages
Greater control
Close supervision
Fast communication between subordinates and superiors
Disadvantages
Higher cost
Involvement of superiors in subordinates work
Great distance between the top and bottom of the
organization
Wide Span of Control
Advantages
Delegation of authority is forced
A positive feeling of responsibility and worth results
for subordinates
Policies must be developed clearly and in detail
Careful selection of subordinates becomes critical
Distance between the top and bottom levels is small
Operational costs are minimized
Disadvantages
More difficult to maintain control
Inefficient managers may cause decision delays
Steps in Organizing
1) Identifying
Specific Tasks or Activities
People with relevant skills
2) Grouping the
Tasks and Activities
3) Assigning
Resources and Responsibilities
Funding, Personnel, time and facilities
Authority as well as responsibility is delegated
4) Coordinating
Activities and Relationships
Harmonize in a common action and effort
Communicate throughout the organization
Line and Staff Relationships
Relates directly to authority
Line function is supervisory
Lines of authority run from top to bottom
Staff function is advisory
Provide line administrators with info, special advice,
and counsel
Authority here is based on expertise not position
Figure
8.5
Figure
8.6
Line and Staff Relationships
The line may devise, but the staff must advise
The line makes decisions and acts on them.
The staff counsels and advises
Functional Authority
Is a right delegated to a person by a top-level
administrator to perform a line function in a department or admin unit of which
he or she is not a member
Example: a
financial specialist (staff) may be given responsibility to move into an
athletics dept. that is having financial problems, and would answer to the
provost, not the AD; No new authority, but part of the ADs authority is reassigned
Benefits and Limitations in Using Staff
Specialization has become very sophisticated
The director or administrator needs the advice of the
specialists
Specialists may need functional authority to make
certain decisions without the line manager
Too much staff authority confuses the workers;
undermines the line authority; when a plan fails that is recommended by the
staff, staff and line take sides and blame the other; staff may not see the
whole picture
Making Line and Staff Relationships Productive
Establish conditions for productive line and staff
relationships
Some people in
authoritative positions are not willing to listen to the experts; fear of
losing power or looking stupid, or some other psychological reason; or to save
money
Need to establish mutual respect and appreciation
Staff need to do their research thoroughly; and
administrators must keep staff fully informed of facts related to decisions
that may affect the specialists role
Decentralizing Authority and Delegation
Provides key decision-making opportunities for
lower-level administrators who are closer to the place where production
actually occurs
Advantages
Improved product quality
Improved morale
Reduction of red tape and operating costs
More time for top-level executives to devote to other
activities, i.e., PR and Development
Delegation
Means by which decentralization is achieved
Authorizing a person or persons to act in ones behalf
Along with accountability and responsibility
Involves the staff in executing basic functions geared
to meet defined objectives
Delegation Process -
Engel
1. A superior
determines that there are some objectives that may not be accomplished
2. Must shift the
obligation for an objectives accomplishment to someone else
3. Selects a
delegate
4. Superior explains
the scope of the objective and the nature of the obligation
5. Authority is
shifted to the delegate to achieve the objective
6. Scope of the
objective may be narrowed or broadened; and the delegate gets wide latitude
The delegate must be allowed to play his/her role in
achieving the necessary objectives McConkey
7. The delegate
either achieves, fails, or partially achieves the objective
8. The superior
evaluates the results, and may or may not withdraw the authority from the
delegate
Danger of Over-delegating
If the director does not have enough time to get all
the things done that he/she considers important, then they should delegate
Which functions should the director handle:
Handle his/her own hot potatoes
Emergency situations
Important matters that have serious consequences
Matters of exception to general policy and routine
procedures
Conduct appraisals of his or her subordinates
Reward or punish subordinates
Do jobs requiring his/her status and position
What Functions to Delegate
The administrator can usually delegate:
Routine and inconsequential details to his/her
secretary and staff assistants
Tasks and duties that others can handle as well as or
better than he/she can jobs that use specialized skills
Activities that will lead to the development of the
subordinates and their skills
Staff evaluations - director
Scheduling of facilities - delegate
Unpleasant or undesirable tasks share in the tasks
New director avoid delegating too much in the
beginning
Barriers to Effective Delegation
Directors reluctance to let go
Insecure in position, is more competent than any
subordinate, doesnt know how to delegate, fearful of the competency of the
subordinate who might replace the director someday, unable to adequately define
objectives
Subordinates reluctance to accept responsibility
Do not understand the requirements of the task
Too dependent on others
Feel uncomfortable with the organization
Do not believe in themselves
Fear of criticism
Already feel overworked
Action Guides for Effective Delegation
Set fair and attainable job standards
Understand the concept of delegation
Know subordinates capabilities
Develop meaningful goals and objectives
Correct subordinates mistakes tactfully
Reward subordinates with greater responsibility
Show genuine concern for what the subordinates are
doing
Provide training for handling responsibility
Delegate authority along with responsibility
Be aware of areas that should not be delegated
Acknowledge the importance of results