Chapter 18- Foreign Policy (FP):
(1). Outline
history of US Foreign Policy, from isolationism
thru Cold
War to post-CW.
(2).
Define the following key FP terms:
(3).
Define national interest; contrast decision making for FP w/that for domestic policy.
(4).
Discuss the enumerated & implied powers set by the Constitution for making FP.
(5). Examine the inherent
advantage of the President in making foreign policy.
(6). Outline the role of the White House, the Bureaucracy, the
Congress, and
the
Public in shaping American foreign policy.
(7). Discuss the US National Security
structure and key DOD organizations & leaders.
(8). Discuss Foreign
Policy challenges facing the
(9).
Assess the future direction of US National Security Policy and
Military Strategy,
required military Force Levels,
(10). Discuss current foreign policy
issues and their political impact on the
- Threat Assessment: - War on Terrorism; - WMD & the North Korean crisis;
- Arab-Israeli conflict - War & Peace(?) w/Iraq; -
- Domestic economic slump & its
impact on “free International Trade;
-
v
A Brief History
of
Ř
18-1a The Isolationist Era:
§ 1st 150 yrs of US
History
·
(
·
stressed
avoiding political connections overseas
·
US
militarily weak & focus on expansion westward
·
Not
interested in global role (2 oceans of separation)
§
1823:
·
·
WW1 (W.
¨
After WW1=> isolationism returns
w/vengeance
¨
Senate
rejects League of Nations &
Versailles treaty
·
WWII=> US stays out of
¨
Why does US change its mind about
involvement?
·
Post WWII=> US rethinks previous
isolationism
Ř
18-1b The Globalism Era=> Cold War:
§ US prepared to use force to protect global interests
§ Marshall Plan=> rebuild
§ Post WWII=>
·
Appear
to support global communism & expansion
§ Truman Doctrine=> Containment
Policy & Strategy
§ NATO vs.
§ NSC-68=> National Security Strategy for Containment
·
(Major
increase in Defense budget required)
§ 1950: Korean War
§ US vs.
§ Preventing following dominoes=> Vietnam
War
·
Support French (Ike)=>
·
SOF advisors (JFK)
·
·
Division in
§ Seeking a way out of quagmire (Triangular Diplomacy)
·
Nixon => “Peace with Honor”?
·
Extraction=> “
§ Détente with Soviets
§ Ending Détente (Carter)=>
§ Reagan & the” Evil Empire” (getting tough w/Soviets)
§ Mikhail Gorbachev=> Perestroika & Glasnost
§ Reagan’s SDI=> outspending the Soviets into defeat
§ Year of Revolution & fall of
·
Fall of
§ US Military operations in
·
·
·
§ Fall of
Ř
18-1c After the Cold War:
§
§ Enlargement (
·
·
·
Bosnia & NATO peacekeeping- 1995
·
·
Kosovo – NATO bombing &
peacekeeping- 2000
§ Neo-isolationism (Bush W.) 2000=>
Ř
Post 9/11 National Security Policy & Strategy:
§ Counter Terror Policy & Strategy: Bush Doctrine
·
Preemptive strikes & preventative
war
¨
v Foreign Policy (FP) Versus Domestic Policy (DP)
Ř
National Interest & its various degrees
§ Vital vs. Important- (who decides?)
§ Two presidencies:
·
At Home( weak) vs. Abroad (strong)-
why?
Ř
18-2a The Constitution and Foreign Policy:
§ Article II=> enumerated Presidential powers:
·
Commander in Chief
·
Power to make treaties (subject to
Senate)
·
Appoint Ambassadors (Senate also)
§ Article I=> enumerated Congressional powers:
·
Provide for common defense
·
Regulate commerce
·
Define & punish Piracies &
Felonies on high seas
·
Declare War
·
Raise & support Armies &
maintain a Navy
·
Make rules & regs for land &
naval forces (UCMJ)
·
Power of the purse => (fund
deployments)
Ř
18-2b The President’s Inherent Advantages
(& powers):
§ FP success depends on speed,
discretion, & flexibility
§ Presidential initiatives in FP vs. Domestic Policy (DP)
·
Unless (FP- crisis) versus until (DP-
tax cut)
Ř
18-2c The power of Precedent:
§ Truman to present=> Implied power as CINC (
·
Now accepted as precedent (though
grudgingly)
Ř
18-2d Supreme Court Rulings:
§ US v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation (1936)
·
President’s FP powers go beyond
Constitution
·
Impact: expand implied
Presidential FP powers
§ US v.
·
Result: executive agreements trend up (See
§ Court further usually refuses to hear challenges on FP
·
Effect: supports presidential FP
prerogatives
·
Desire to avoid Presidential/Congress
disputes in FP
·
Also Court believes FP simply beyond
their competence
Ř
18-2e The Behavior of Congress:
§ Partisan & institutional divisions in Congress=>
·
Results in their lack of unified
action to challenge
§ Belief in strong Presidential leadership in FP
§ Electoral considerations (what if President is right?)
§ Post WWII vs. post
§ End of Cold War => more Congressional activism
§ Post
v Who Makes
Ř
18-3a The White House:
§ Role of President & VP (varies w/administration)
§ National Security Council (NSC)
·
President & VP
·
SECSTATE & SECDEF
·
Director CIA & CJCS (advisors)
§ NSC advisor & her staff’s role
·
Honest broker vs. policy advocate
Ř
18-3b The Foreign Policy Bureaucracy:
§ Roles of DOS vs. DOD (current
§ Uniformed Armed Services (CJCS
& JCS chiefs)
§ Intelligence community & selected agencies
§ Expertise & experience must be
taken into account
§ Also compete with each other for power, influence, & $$$
§ Result: drive FP to include own interests
& agenda
Ř
18-3c Congress:
§ Extent of interests & influence varies over time
·
Cold War vs. post-Watergate &
post-Vietnam War
§
3 ways Congress influences FP:
·
Substantive legislation ($$ power)
·
Procedural legislation (how laws & regs
applied)
·
Efforts to shape Public Opinion (Dems
on
Ř
18-3d The Public:
§ Two options for Public to shape FP:
·
Join interest groups & lobby
Congress & President
·
Vote for candidates aligned
w/political views
§ Public seldom able to effect day to day polices (
·
Often policy makers decide w/little
regard to Public
·
Public lack detailed knowledge &
expertise
·
Apathy (most don’t even know/care
where crisis spot is)
¨
More concerned with domestic &
economic issues
§ Public usually rallies around President once action starts
·
Initial
resistance to deployment => active support
§ Public Opinion provide decision makers w/little guidance
·
NTL=> two indirect effects:
¨
Constrains policies which can be
considered
Ř
¨
Determines
Ř
§ Media & public concern re.
§ Now FBI going to
v Challenges to the
Ř
Major debate continues on US role in post-Cold War
Ř
18-4a Disagreements about Goals & Strategies
& Change:
§ Terror strike of
§ Debate now centers on US strategy to prevent 2nd attack
·
Preventive War & pre-emptive
strikes (Bush W)
¨
(*Containment strategy no longer
option)
§ Homeland Defense & Security at what expense?
·
$$$ & Freedoms (The Patriot Act)
Ř
18-4c Unilateralism Versus Multilateralism:
§ Closely related to above strategic debate:
·
·
UN involvement (& to what extent,
if any)
Ř
Other Foreign Policy Considerations:
§ Terrorism &War/Peace in Iraq
& ME
§