v
Korea
Ø
Historical
Overview
§
Japan annexed Korea in 1910
·
Colonial imposition on Korean engendered=>
¨
Strong anti-colonial nationalism in people
§
Following WWII=> Korea (like Vietnam) divided- how?
·
Communist North vs. Non-communist South
§
Both Korea & Vietnam would fight civil wars
·
US would intervene in both to halt spread of what?
·
US had little knowledge or experience with either
state
Ø
As Japanese
Colony
§
Japan, China, & Russia fought over Korea – who
won?
·
Sino-Japanese
War (1894-95)
·
Russo-Japanese
War (1904-05)
·
Result: Korea made protectorate(1905) & annex
(1910)
§
Japan made substantial investment in Korea (esp.
North)
·
Colonial transformation in virtually all aspects:
¨
Economic, political, social, literary, & artistic
·
Hugh $ investment in roads, rail, telegraph, energy,
etc.
·
Korea’s standard of living & education levels
improved
·
Population grew from 14m (1910) to 24m by 1940
§
By 1930s=> Korean cities formed modern culture
§
Japan had essentially conducted a quasi-Meiji reform
·
Result: Korea totally changed from its state in 1910
§
These positive aspects were achieved at a high cost:
·
Japan’s aims/motives: exploit Korea to Japan’s benefit
·
Strategy: make it a subordinate part of Imperial
Japan
¨
Land tax reform benefited only the land owners
¨
Koreans remained subordinate to Japanese admin
Ø
Particularly galling to an older Korean culture
§
Japan repressed any sign of dissent
·
Korean police used as tool in this regard- brutality
·
“assimilation” into Japanese style was mandatory
·
Japan’s bitter legacy persists in Korea to this day
Ø
North and
South Korea
§
North- South spit followed immediately after WWII
·
Which nations occupied which areas?
§
Promise of unification failed to materialize- what
did?
·
US encouraged South to develop democracy & self
gov
·
Had to settle for anti-communist authoritarian state
¨
Role of Syngman Rhee=>
end of US military gov.
¨
Stoutly supported by conservatives &refugees from?
§
USSR established communist government under whom?
·
USSR withdraws troops in late 1949
·
Role of Kim Il
Sung- our “great” leader
¨
Trusted by China & USSR as good communist
¨
Totalitarian government & cult of personality
§
US withdraws troops in 1949-1950
·
Part of larger Asian strategy to “let dust settle”
·
Followed KMT’s loss to Communist forces
Ø
Civil War and
US involvement
§
North Korea’s Invasion (25 June 1950- Map 34-3)
·
Aim of North Korea’s (NK) invasion of South?
§
Kim Il Sung had
gotten whose permission to invade?
·
Also extracted promise of military support from whom?
¨
Condition for support: if US intervened
·
NK assumed quick victory before US could respond
§
US viewed invasion as part of global communist
strategy
·
US rush occupation troops from Japan to slow advance
¨
Obtain UN backing for international force response
¨
Send 7th Fleet to Taiwan Straits to check PRC moves
·
US concerned NK invasion a diversion- why/for what?
¨
US assumed Soviet complicity- why?
Ø
Korean War (Map)
§
North Korea attack on a broad front=>
·
Pushed US & South Korean (SK) troops reeling south
·
Desperate attempt made to buy time for US deployment
¨
Sacrifice of Task Force Smith
¨
US & SK forces retreat south to Pusan Peninsula
¨
As NK forces extend LOCs- Mac attacks where?
Ø
Inchon
landing to cut off NK overextended LOCs
§
From Containment
to Roll back:
·
Changing war
aims in mid-war (“mission creep”)
·
US gets greedy & decides to do what=> new war
aim?
·
MacArthur pushes to Yalu river & upsets whom?
¨
China’s response? (“band new war”?)
Ø
Attack overextended UN forces in turn- flee south
·
US counter-attacks (Gen Ridgeway) & pushes North
¨
Along 38th parallel stalemate sets in to
war’s end
¨
Both sides conduct bitter tactical forays- purpose?
Ø
Gain terrain for negotiations at bargaining table
¨
After two years of fighting while negotiating=>
Ø
Armistice concluded on 27 July 1953 (Ike’s role)
§
China & NK pursued political aims &
strategy (Sun Tsu)
·
US pursued military strategy (Clausewitz)
(…repeated)
Ø
Recent
Developments
§
NK becomes totalitarian state following war
·
Stalinist style dictatorship & cult of personality
·
Kim Il Sung
rules w/ iron fist – strict communist dogma
·
Kim Jong-Il
(“Dear Leader”) will follow- why unique?
·
NK becomes isolated & its economy stagnate
§
Rhee remained SK
president until forced to retire in 1960
·
27 years followed under rule of two Generals turned
civ
¨
Park Chung-hee
(by military coup in 1961)
Ø
Semi-authoritarian rule w/limited freedoms
Ø
Free market economy=> SK prospers
Ø
Employs police & agents to maintain power
§
(to be fair- NK penetrations routine)
·
Following Park’s assassination (1999)=>
¨
Chun Dou-hwan
seized power- becomes civilian
Ø
Elected president in controlled election – to 1987
§
Under both presidents=> SK economic growth
impressive
·
Gov supported Bz & US provided $ & market for
export
·
Stunning growth: From $11B in 1960 to $457B by 2000
·
Korean labor=> 1 of hardest working people in world
·
Quickly moved to developed nation status
§
What was ironic about gov $ success on people’s
attitude?
§
Economic prosperity nurtured by Park & Chun =>
·
Produced vibrant middle class- who wanted what?
·
Bath tub incident at ROK CIA headquarters &
impact?
¨
Protest & free election=> Roh Tae-woo interim step
§
1991: Kim Young-sam
(moderate) elected in free election
·
Purged former Generals who supported Chun
·
Launched investigation=> $ corruption of Chun &Roh
¨
Convicted of stashing $100Ms in off shore accounts
Ø
Also of ordering killing of 100s of protestors
Ø
Imprisoned but subsequently released
§
1997: Kim
Dae-jung (pix p. 990) elected president
·
Pro-democracy advocate who escaped assassination
·
Popular idealists=> pursued “sunshine policy” w/NK
¨
NK response? => impact of it (along w/-$) on Kim?
§
Since USSR’s demise & China’s pursuit of free
market=>
·
What is the current status of North Korea?
·
Why is the US concerned about it?
v
Vietnam
Ø
The Colonial
Backdrop- Overview:
§
France defeated Nguyen dynasty in 1883
·
Formed Indochina
Union* of Vietnam & Cambodia
Ø
Formed in 1887* and added Laos in 1893
§
Why is Indochina a classic example of colonial rule?
·
French people over Asian for what purpose?
·
Infrastructure investments for what purpose?
·
Status of indigenous people within colonial system?
·
Benefits to land owning elite at whose expense?
·
Provision of education vs. keeping labor class
·
Result: no chance for formation of middle class
§
Vietnam Nationalist formed political parties in exile
·
What happened if they tried to come home?
·
Role of Ho Chi
Minh- Nationalists or Communist?
Ø
First
Indo-China Anti-colonial War (1946-1954 Map):
§
Viet Minh vs. Colonial
occupation forces
·
Who controls what?
§
France sets up regional Indochina government in 1948
·
Role of Bao Dai?
§
Both sides fight low level insurgency until 1954
·
What significant event occurs then?
§
French defeat at Dien
Bien Phu (Map)
·
French paratroopers build remote base in NW Vietnam
¨
Aim: lure Viet Minh into major battle (so…?)
·
Urged on by Chinese- Gen Giap surrounds French
¨
Position arty on top of surrounding mountains
¨
French located in valley in several linked fire bases
¨
Airstrip provides main re-supply/reinforcement
·
Fighting ensue
for weeks & one by one Fr bases fall
¨
When airstrip falls French use paradrop-not enough
¨
Soon isolated & cut off- no re-supply or
reinforcements
·
Paris appeals to Ike for military support- but no deal
·
French forced to surrender as French people loose will
§
Geneva Peace Conference divided country at 17th
parallel
·
(Not supported by US- Ike)
·
Communist North led by who?
·
Non-communist South led by Ngo Dinh Diem
¨
Established Republic
of Vietnam (RVN)
¨
Diem’s support from 900K fleeing from North
Ø
The Vietnam
War (1959 -1975- Map)
§
AKA=> the
Second Indo-China War
·
1940: US urged French to negotiate settlement w/Ho
¨
What made US change its mind?
¨
Why did US decide to recognize Bao Dai gov?
¨
How connected to US Cold War strategy?
·
Initial US involvement under Ike w/advisors
·
Late 1950s: insurgency begins again in South
¨
Viet Minh revived=> Viet Cong (Diem repression)
¨
North begins sending agents South along trail (Map)
Ø
Motivated when Diem rejects free elections in ‘56
·
JFK: send SOF advisors- reached 16K by 1963
¨
Initiated OPLAN 34a- covert operations
·
1964: Diem gov appears on verge of failure
¨
VC controlled rural areas at night
¨
Heavy handed strategic village program failure
¨
Then: Tonkin Gulf incident=> Congress blank check
·
1965-1968: LBJ begins Americanization of the war
¨
Ground combat troop levels escalate & take over
¨
By Tet ‘68=> troop levels reached over 540K
¨
American casualties
mount & US becomes divided
§
Some reasons for America’s Vietnam defeat:
·
1. South too diverse to unify & govern against
North
·
2. RVN gov was corrupt & inspired little loyalty
·
3. Ho Chi Minh considered national hero by most
·
4. NVA unified & more determined fighters than ARVN
·
5. US tech advantaged lost over jungle terrain
·
6. US political leaders tried to fight limited war
·
7. US Strategy of attrition & gradual
escalation
·
8. North Vietnam willing to pay the cost of winning
·
9. US lost political will as casualties continue to
mount
·
At end of day, Vietnam was an insurgency
¨
Aggressively supported by Communist North
¨
Willing to pay any price to achieve it political aim
¨
US constrained to limited aims & limited cost
¨
When price became too much for US to bear=>
Ø
America lost
its political will to continue
§
Misperceptions of a failed strategy
·
US linked war with Cold War containment at first
¨
Finally realized impact of Sino-Soviet split
¨
Focused on containing Chinese communism then on
¨
Failed to appreciate Vietnam’s attitude about China
·
As US involvement & cas rise=> US lost political
will
§
1968-1973: Nixon searched for an exit strategy
·
Use triangular diplomacy w/China & USSR
·
“Vietnamization” & “peace with honor”?
·
Kissinger negotiated tenuous compromise w/North
·
Christmas bombing & finally a settlement
§
1973-1975: North bides its time & waits for chance
·
Strikes in Spring of 1975=> RVN forces collapse
Ø
War with
Cambodia
§
1975: Pol Pot
& the Khmer Rouge in power
§
1975-78: the “killing fields” strategy & its costs
§
1978: Vietnam & Cambodia clash at border
·
Historical enemies
·
Pol Pot purges all pro-Vietnam elements
·
Vietnam occupies much of Cambodia=> puppet gov
·
Khmer Rouge conduct insurgency- rest accept Vietnam
§
Meanwhile- USSR & Vietnam align closer
·
USSR get Cam Rhan Bay in return for $/mil/diplomacy
·
Relations with China continue to deteriorate
§
China feels wartime support not appreciated
·
Resent ill treatment by Vietnam of its ethnic Chinese
·
Decide to “teach Vietnam a lesson”- how they do?
Ø
Recent
Developments
§
Impact of USSR’s collapse on Vietnam
·
$ aid no longer available & leaders search for $
§
1989: UN replaced Vietnam in Cambodia
·
UN sets up gov comprised of contending factions
·
Pro-Vietnam communist leader staged successful coup
·
Pol Pot dies & Khmer Rouge collapsed
¨
Impact on Vietnam- China relations?
§
Mid 1990s: China-Vietnam open trade relations
·
China allowed to use Haiphong to ship its exports
·
1995: Vietnam joined ASEAN=> $ trade increases
·
Established diplomatic relations with US
§
Communist continued to dominate all aspects of Gov
·
Support state run heavy industries
·
At same time=> allow free market to grow=>
¨
Doi moi reforms
·
Collective agriculture replaced by private farms
¨
Result: starvation ends & Vietnam now exports rice
¨
Consumer goods manufacturing rises
·
Role of South as Vietnam’s $ engine (Saigon)
§
2000: NTL key problems still remain- what are they?
v
East Asia in World Perspective
Ø
No magic
potion for successful industrialization
§
East Asia’s success offers clear example of why
§
West & Japan merely industrialized first
Ø
Industrialization
in East Asia- five key issues:
§
Wages & competition:- old vs. new paradigm
·
Previous developed nations vs. undeveloped nations:
¨
Old=> finished goods for raw material/light indust.
¨
New=> no longer holds – why?
·
Cheap and skilled hi-tech Asian labor challenge
West
·
Europe’s response- protective tariffs
·
US current response:
·
Keep markets opens & improve competitiveness
(1990s)
·
Hold wages down
·
Restructure corporations & relocate jobs overseas
·