v
Ronald
Reagan’s Cold War (1981-1989):
Ø
Overview -
Cold War Victor?
§
Foreign Policy
background & experience?
·
Actor, president of
screen actors guild, governor;
§
Interest, knowledge,
& effectiveness in Foreign Policy?
·
Carter & Reagan –
contrasts in styles:
¨
Hands on
& meticulous vs. detached &
uninformed;
§
View of Communism,
USSR, & US relations with it:
·
Limited to experience
& point paper briefs;
·
Suspicions of communist
intent;
§
View of Détente, SALT II, & the “one way
street”:
·
US economic aid &
technology;
·
Prop to an inefficient
& oppressive system;
·
Dangerous military
threat;
§
Perception: US-USSR
nuclear weapons imbalance:
·
Closing the “window of vulnerability”;
·
Increase US Nukes &
decrease Soviets=> Result?
§
Transformation later
during 2nd term:
·
Evil Empire to
business partner in peace;
·
Reversing course (more in detail next week);
§
Key question: Why did Reagan change toward USSR?
§
Two conflicting
arguments:
·
1. Reagan’s active engagement w/Soviets in Arms Race:
¨
Soviets couldn’t keep up economically=> bankrupt;
·
2. Gorbachev’s concessions &
unilateral disarmament;
Ø
Reagan’s Grand Strategy:
§
Regan’s reliance on hard line advisors – 1st
term:
·
Committee on
Present Danger: composition
=>
¨
Vehement
anti-communists/anti-Soviets;
¨
Strongly opposed SALT II (& détente)=>
Ø
Soviet 1st strike capability & ready to use it;
Ø
Scenario envisioned: Nuclear blackmail;
¨
US must acquire
capability to engage Soviets =>
Ø
At all levels of conflict => i.e. strategic
and ???
§
And on an extended time frame;
Ø
Result? Impact
on DOD funding?
§
From $171B up to $376B
(over 2X plus up);
§
Revived B-1 bomber;
§
Deployed MX &
Trident;
§
BMD & ASAT
development;
§
Conventional forces
revitalized:
·
(Military’s reaction to
election results);
¨
(Navy especially happy –
why?)
Ø
Unadvertised additional key strategic objective?
§
Unadvertised major strategic objective:
·
US-Soviet arms race that will bust Soviet $$$;
·
US strategy & impact
on Soviets attempt to keep up:
¨
Disrupt Soviet economy;
¨
Reagan’s Full
Court Press strategy:
Ø
Deny critical resources
to Soviets;
Ø
Deny hard currency from oil & natural
gas;
Ø
Deny access to western
high technology:
§
Pentagon’s Office of Technology Assessment;
·
Impact?
¨
Military Buildup +
$$$ stress => contributed to =>
Ø
Soviet economic collapse of early 1990s;
¨
Any impact on US
economy? (what & why?)
Ø
Reagan Doctrine:
§
Doctrine’s premise of Soviet’s role in the 3rd
World?
·
(Vs. local political, economic, environmental factors);
§
Doctrine’s strategic aim: reverse Soviet 3rd World gains;
·
Strategy: support
anti-communist Regimes =>
¨
By all means necessary- (Overt or Covert);
·
In the process, overcome what Foreign Policy affliction suffered by America during this
period?
·
Examples of US convert
anti-communist support:
¨
Poland (Solidarity);
¨
Angola (UNITA);
¨
Afghanistan ($2B in CIA
support to Mujahedeen);
¨
Central America – (perceived
threat from who?)
Ø
Grenada
& prime example of Reagan Doctrine;
¨
Primary LATAM world concern to Reagan?
Ø
Nicaragua:
Aim – overthrow Ortega government:
§
Ortega
& Sandinistas growing threat:
§
Growing support to FNLM in El Salvador;
Ø
US covert support
to Contras:
§
Covert Ops (Bluefield);
§
Congressional opposition
& Boland I & II;
§
Role of Casey
& Oliver North:
·
lying to Congress;
·
NSC goes underground:
¨
Operation Rescue;
¨
Arms for hostages (ME connection);
§
The scheme unravels (60 minutes investigates):
·
Iran-Contra Affair & the cover-up;
·
President & VP plead: “out of the loop”;
·
McFarland, North, Poindexter take the fall;
Ø
Human Rights:
§
Jeane Kirkpatrick’s role:
·
Intellectual support for
Reagan Doctrine – how?
·
Conservative realists (balance of power);
·
Distinction: authoritarian vs. totalitarian govs;
·
Impact?
¨
US aid to
pro-American anti-communist regimes?
¨
South Africa, Guatemala, Haiti, Chili, PI, Pakistan;
¨
Military advisors to El Salvador;
·
1983 change: Reagan’s
call for free elections:
¨
impact? Status of LATAM military dictatorships?
Ø
Reagan
Doctrine: International Terrorism & Middle East:
§
Major thrust of Reagan foreign policy re. Int. Terrorism?
·
Soviet role – regardless
of indigenous causes of tensions:
¨
i.e. Poverty, population growth, regional
conflict;
§
Libya singled
out as Sov. Client supporting Int. terrorism:
·
March 1986: Gulf of Sidra exercise:
¨
Navy CV air: SA-5 radar sites & 3 PBs;
¨
SEAL clandestine ops;
·
Libyan response: Berlin nightclub terror bombing;
·
US response: Air
strike on Col el-Qaddafi’s residence;
·
Libyan counter-move to above? (back in the box?)
§
Middle East
Conflict:
·
Reagan Admin initially
ignores root cause of conflict:
¨
(which is?) – who did they blame for conflict?
·
Early Admin efforts
failed to resolve conflict – why?
¨
Arab refuses to
cooperate militarily with who?
¨
Why? => Refusal of
Israel to negotiate with who?
·
“Humanitarian”
intervention in Lebanon (late 1982):
¨
Real motivation: prop up Gemayal government;
Ø
US sends in USMC (compound) & SF (town);
¨
Druze Militia
seen by US as clients of who?
Ø
US conclusion: remove Druze =>problem solved;
§
New Jersey fires on Druze militia positions;
Ø
Conclusion of Druze?
=> US taking sides:
Ø
Response? Truck bomb USMC compound;
Ø
Congress & Reagan’s
response?
·
PLO issue remains to
this day unresolved – even worse
·
Besides Israel’s survival- what other key interest
does US have in Middle East?
·
What specific region in Middle East has had major
strategic importance since the Truman?
why?
Ø
Persian Gulf:
§
Two key events of region during late 1979 & early
1980s?
·
Soviet invasion of Afghanistan & Iran-Iraq War;
§
Common US & Soviet
interest in region?
·
End of Iran-Iraq War &” tilt” by both toward who?
§
Reagan administration
response?
·
Cooperation vs. confrontation with Soviets?
·
Admin strategy during Iran-Iraq war:
·
tries to play one side
off the other;
·
US Strategic Aim: stalemate;
§
Tilt toward Iraq:
·
US Strategic Aim? Iraq – Soviet relationship?
·
Iraq’s response to US
overtures?
¨
Sticking with a loyal
ally;
¨
Playing both superpowers
to Iraq’s benefit
§
What triggered direct US involvement in the Persian
Gulf?
·
Kuwait’s request &
US response to it;
§
US military operations:
·
Increased presence &convoy escort of re-flagged ships;
·
SEAL-AH-6 ops from 2 barges => Iranian minelayer;
§
Tragic fall-out: Vincennes downs Iranian Airliner;
Ø
Reagan
Doctrine & East Asia:
§
Reagan’s
initial policy of confrontation with
China:
·
Increased support &
arms sales to Taiwan;
·
American Troop build-up
in Korea;
·
Remilitarization of Japan:
¨
Urged to take
responsibility for own air/sea defense;
¨
Especially sensitive
issue for Asians – why?
§
US reverses policy &
initiates active cooperation w/China:
·
What motivates this reversal?
¨
Potential thaw in
Sino-Soviet relations detected;
¨
Strategic cooperation w/China sought against who?
§
Sino-American Rapprochement:
·
US concludes more to
gain w/US-China cooperation;
·
US seeks China help in
supporting Mujahedeen;
·
China’s motivation?
– what does China want from US?
·
Aug’82: both reach
accord on what contentious issue?
¨
(US to continue selling arms, but gradually reduce);
§
According to SECSTATE Shultz, what major obstacle
remain potential problem for improved US-China relations?
Ø
Reagan
Doctrine & Europe:
§
NSDD-32:
·
US seeks to “neutralize”
USSR Control East Europe;
·
Strategy
(one option) to accomplish neutralization?
¨
Encourage liberalization of E. European satellites;
¨
Example: Covert $$$ support to Poland’s Solidarity;
§
“Crusade for
Freedom”?
·
Keep the pressure on the
Soviets & its satellites;
·
Promote democratic
ideals & actions around the world;
·
Build democratic infrastructures(?)
§
Soviet reaction?
·
Pravda warns
if a “catastrophe” – why/Soviet concern?
§
Reagan’s response?
·
Continues to press for
expansion of freedom in E. Euro:
¨
Rejects permanent
acceptance of E. European people’s subjugation;
·
But Schultz also
stresses a caveat about type of change:
¨
What is the type of change the US supports?
§
What previous administration had a similar policy
toward Soviet satellites of Eastern Europe?
·
What was it called?
§
Western Europe’s Response to Crusade for Freedom?
·
Unsupportive of economic
pressures & trade sanctions;
¨
(Polish government’s martial law excepted);
·
West Europeans continue
trade with Soviets:
¨
Opposed to US confrontation approach;
¨
Desire to maintain good
relations with USSR – why?
¨
Effect of maintaining Détente & Ostpolitik on West?
§
West Europe
also opposed Reagan Doctrine where
else?
·
France/Spain refused
US flyover to bomb who in ‘86?
·
In contrast
to US anti-Soviet strategy of $$$ sanctions:
¨
West Europe employs
$$$ incentives instead;
¨
Objective:
modify Soviet conduct in 3rd
World=>
Ø
Through positive inducements;
§
Result: Europe’s détente & Sov-West Euro $
ties trump= >
Reagan administration’s goal to isolate Soviet Union;
·
Example: Natural gas Pipeline project from
Siberia:
¨
US blocks sale of US pipeline technology to USSR;
¨
Later ordered US & Euro firms to break contract;
·
Western Europe’s Reaction? Effect on relations?
¨
What midterm election move upset allies
especially?
¨
Reagan administration’s
action 5 months later?
Ø
Nuclear
Weapons Control:
§
Both INF & START talks going nowhere during 1st
term;
§
Despite Admin’s natural
resistance to Arms Control=>
·
Reagan reconsiders
& becomes more flexible – why?
¨
Growing Public(protest) & Congressional
pressure;
Ø
Growing anti-Nuke movement;
¨
NATO allies
exert pressure to engage in Arms talks;
·
1981: US
offers Zero Option (?) (described p. 245);
¨
At issue: mobile Soviet
SS-20s & US Pershing IIs & GLCMs + NATO missiles;
¨
Soviet response?
¨
Also various counter proposals (back & forth);
·
NATO presses
Reagan to abandon Zero Option:
¨
30 Mar’83: US offers “interim agreement” instead:
Ø
Equal #s of US & USSR warheads worldwide;
¨
Soviet Response?
Ø
Brits & French Nukes must also be included;
Ø
Soviet counteroffer
also rejected;
§
Soviet response to West
German Bundestag approval of
US cruise missile deployment to NATO?
§
INF & START talks status throughout Reagan 1st
term?
§
INF & START* talks status throughout Reagan 1st
term?
·
By Nov 1983, both talks had failed;
·
*(Admin’s START offer was designed to be rejected);
Ø
KAL 007 Shoot-down:
§
31 Aug 1983: (day in the
life of a Pentagon ILO);
§
Soviets down Korean A/L - strayed off course into USSR:
·
All 269 on board perish;
·
Flew near Soviet missile
base on Kamchatka Peninsula;
§
Soviet may have confuse
A/L with previous US spy plane:
·
Flown in vicinity of
where Korean 007 had strayed;
§
Reagan’s reaction?
·
Act of barbarism;
§
Impact on US Congressional attitudes & action?
·
Effect on attempts to
undercut military build-up?
§
Effective exploitation
by Admin of KAL 007 incident?
·
NSDD-102:
reverse Soviet peacemaker image;
§
Soviet reaction to US
attacks on its conduct?
·
“serious threat to
peace”;
·
impact on US-Soviet
relations?
§
Transcript of Soviet ground control to pilot
exchange;
Ø
Star Wars:
§
Official title? SDI
& BMD means?
·
Ground or space based weaps to attack Soviet ICBMs:
·
Strategic Aim:
¨
Attack ballistic
missiles prior to hitting US targets;
·
Technical difficulty?
§
Impact on accepted
Nuclear Strategy up to then?
·
Major change – why? What strategy does it replace?
§
Secondary goal of SDI program?
·
Potential impact on
Soviet economy? Why?
·
Critics argument against effectiveness of SDI?
¨
$$$ of Soviet counter-measures vs, $$$ of SDI?
Ø
Decoys & hugh numbers of real warheads;
§
Soviet reaction to
Reagan’s change to “defense”?
·
Impact on US-Soviet
Nuclear balance?
·
Potential for first strike advantage => then SDI;
§
Other critical concerns:
· &nbs